What do you think of this OKR?
Objective: High product adoption of VWX
Key results:
- VWX achieves 10,000 monthly active users (MAU) by June 30 (end of quarter)
- VWX achieves average engagement session length of greater than 1 minute over a minimum an engaged audience of 3000
- VWX achieves stickiness of more than 50% by June 30 (average Daily/Monthly active users)
So, whats so wrong with this OKR?
It has a clear, non-quantified, objective
The key results all have numbers (so they are analogue) and a deadline (stated or implied).
The key results seem like things you would want and seem to measure a high product adoption.
That is all good, so what is the problem?
I could quibble about measuring key result #1 on at the quarter end. If the team are working hard to deliver this their good work may not have had time to play out. They may finish work on June 30 but it might take weeks for the world to notice and active users to increase.
But actually, there is a bigger problem.
The problem is less about the wording of the OKR but the destination: this was an OKR given to a development team. Coders, Testers and maybe Analysts were supposed to make this OKR happen.
The implication is that the technical staff can exercise control over user behaviour. That suggest the company believes that product quality alone drives usage. Is that a fair assumption to make?
Maybe, I’d like to see some evidence.
However, on the whole I think not. A well placed advertising campaign might do more to boost user figures than some new feature.
Or look at engagement, I’m not sure what this product was doing but 1 minute of usage might imply that they product was slow, the user might be waiting for a status update. It might even be slow because many other users were using it.